North Korea’s Overture on Nuclear Talks and Inter-Korean Relations for 2022: ‘Strategic Patience’
North Korea held the 4th Plenary Meeting of the Workers’ Party’s 8th Central Committee from December 27 to 31. According to the North’s state media, Kim Jong Un mostly focused his message on rural and agricultural development as the country’s economy has plummeted due to strict anti-pandemic measures to prevent the spread of the Covid-19 inside of his country.
As the UN-led crippling economic sanctions imposed on North Korea have intensified since Kim’s ascension in 2011 due to the North’s growing nuclear and missile threats against US allies in East Asia – South Korea and Japan – Kim expressed his strong will to revive the country’s disastrous economy as the country has been facing unprecedented economic crisis after the 1990s Arduous March.
While setting other plans to improve the economy, Kim also reaffirmed the North’s overtures and policies on “inter-Korean relations and the field of external affairs” during the plenary meeting. Still, the state media did not provide details while reporting that the country would “bolster the military capability.”
It could be a signal that North Korea will not return to the negotiating table in 2022, implying that South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s final attempt to reactivate the peace process before the end of his tenure in May will not work. However, it should not be interpreted as Kim has no interest in sitting down with US’s and South Korea’s leaders as he would want to recover his international reputation, tarnished in Hanoi after the summit’s debacle, as a powerful autocratic leader.
Undisclosed North Korea’s overtures and policies on foreign affairs, especially on nuclear talks and inter-Korean dialogue, could represent Kim’s decision not to renew the stalled negotiations with Washington and Seoul. Alternatively, this lack of focus on international affairs might point to the decision to adopt a North Korean-style “strategic patience” approach toward the denuclearization negotiations.
Considering the current North’s nuclear and missile capabilities, North Korea is going to complete its nuclear armament soon and become virtually an untouchable nuclear-armed country that can directly confront the US. John Bolton, Former National Security Advisor for then-President Donald Trump, said that North Korea is one year closer to perfecting “nuclear, ballistic-missile technology and perhaps hypersonic cruise missiles” due to the Biden administration’s first year of “frenetic diplomacy.”
Kim’s detailed listing of the country’s missile programs at the January 2021 Party Congress – an unusual move from the leader of the most isolated country in the world – signals that his stance on missile development amid the arms race on the Korean Peninsula has remained unchanged. The North will not accept the US deal for Complete Verifiable Irreversible Denuclearization (CVID) in exchange for the lifting of the economic sanctions for the foreseeable future.
In addition, Kim’s attempt to strengthen the North both militarily and economically to gain more leverage in the region implies that the US and South Korea might need to offer better bargaining chips if Kim’s economic plan works without the palpable support from China – Pyongyang’s economic lifeline and largest trading partner – amid crippling economic sanctions and Covid-19 pandemic.
Furthermore, if the North’s economy recovers and thrives even under the economic sanctions and the pandemic, there would be no reason for Pyongyang to negotiate with Washington and Seoul. Kim would prefer to maintain the self-reliance approach in defense and economy to ensure his supreme power and his safety until the end of his life. In this context, there is not much time for the US and South Korea to negotiate with North Korea, as denuclearization negotiations seem to be getting derailed even further.
Some believe that the ball is in Pyongyang’s court on the nuclear talks. It is believed that North Korea would eventually collapse under the UN-led economic sanctions, meaning Washington and Seoul do not have to rush to strike a bad deal with Pyongyang to denuclearize the Korean Peninsula. However, this scenario will not unfold under China’s watch, since it would result in North Korea’s further isolation due to the US and its allies’ encirclement. North Korea’s nuclear and missile capabilities have been advanced continuously as Kim’s father and grandfather chose this path to survive the US.
Under the North’s “strategic patience” approach, Pyongyang is not likely not respond to any US and South Korea statements over its missile tests even if it harshly criticized their “double standard”. Additionally, North Korea’s state media might not publish any statements from high-ranking officials such as Kim Yo Jong, a leading voice on inter-Korean relations, to condemn the joint U.S.-South Korea military drills that will be conducted in the coming months. However, Washington and Seoul should keep reaching out to Pyongyang with a list of detailed economic incentives it can receive for restoring the dialogue through back channels as diplomacy is still the preferred route.
On Monday, South Korean President Moon Jae-in said that his government will pursue “an irreversible path to peace until the end” in his last New Year’s address. However, such a development can only occur when the US and China work closely to tackle the North Korea issue. As the rising tensions between Beijing and Washington give unlimited time to Pyongyang to gain more leverage by building up more advanced weapons and improving the economy, the US and South Korea should entice China to engage in the denuclearization negotiations more actively rather than providing help to North Korea behind the scenes.
To conclude, North Korea seems to be trying to circumvent or even change the regional status quo – military tensions without direct confrontation – US and China have been upholding, by setting a sort of new approach, that of “strategic patience”.
What Comes Next for North Korea-Russia Relations?
North Korea and Russia have taken their relations to a new level after the leaders of the two countries held an in-person summit meeting on Wednesday. While Pyongyang and Moscow […]
South Korea’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, Atmanirbhar Bharat, and the IPEF: Convergence and Commonality
For some time now, the existing multilateral networks such as those of the United Nations (UN) system have been largely ineffective in providing good global governance and helping create resilience, […]
Risk Reduction and Crisis Management on the Korean Peninsula
The situation on the Korean Peninsula is inherently intertwined with the growing instability of the East Asian security environment, where high tensions significantly increase the risk of unintended incidents and armed […]
Washington Declaration: Beyond Korea, What it Means for India?
In April 2023, South Korea and the United States released the Washington Declaration to reiterate and upgrade their treaty alliance. In outlining a joint nuclear deterrence strategy, the Declaration reaffirmed […]
Korea Looks to Europe: Its Growing Military-Strategic Cooperation with NATO
Korea is looking to Europe in the military-strategic dimension. It wants to boost ties with NATO even as strengthening relations with the AP4 (four Asia-Pacific partners) forms an important aspect […]
Understanding North Korea’s Resilience through Economy, Laws and Governance: a review of introductory sources and essential monographs
This article reviews contributions that may help researchers re-evaluate the question of the North Korea’s remarkable resilience in spite of its undeniable economic failure, a seemingly obscure legal system, and […]