China and the Nordics: Tracing Trends in Relations
- Diplomatic relations between Modern China and the Nordic States grew from different points of departure yet followed roughly congruent paths, adhering closely to Beijing’s domestic and regional priorities.
- Trade and political exchanges were instrumentalized to facilitate the immediate goals of Nordic and Chinese leaders, going through periods of greater proximity and disruption as objectives transformed.
- Modern relations have been deeply affected by the increased economic, social, and interpersonal exchanges inherent to the globalized world, with significant implications for discourses on human rights, international value chains, technological development, and security.
- The dual perception of China as both a partner and competitor is fueling a push to reevaluate Sino-Nordic relations. This manifests itself in concerns about the national security impact of mergers and acquisitions, escalated diplomatic rhetoric, and Beijing’s growing willingness to apply economic pressure over political issues. At the same time, the recognition of China’s importance on the international stage necessitates cooperation on financial, governance, and environmental issues.
- Even during periods of lacking state-to-state relations, ideological exchanges continued to shape Sino-Nordic relations. Maoist thought and practice entered Nordic political discourse at a critical juncture, shaping a societal legacy of questioning hierarchy and structures, even after China’s embrace of market principles disillusioned Nordic Maoists.
- Over the past decade, the Arctic has elicited ever more attention from governments, businesses, and civil society. In the context of Sino-Nordic relations, the region occupies a special place with unique challenges and opportunities pertaining to climate change, evolving security considerations, and potential trade and investment flows.
- The main body of the text is sectioned into four parts. The first section explores the historical backdrop of Sino-Nordic relations and provides a brief overview of the interplay between Chinese domestic developments and diplomacy. This is followed by a discussion in the second section of contemporary facets of relations, including economic ties, security concerns, and political considerations. The third section explores an ideological dimension of relations by examining the impact of Chinese political thought and rhetoric on Nordic politics and society. Finally, the report touches upon the Arctic as a unique intersection of Nordic and Chinese interests.
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Konrad Adenauer
Stiftung, which has made this report possible through its generous support.
Politics in East Asia Today: Between Democracy, Debates, and Discourse
Introduction On September 9-10, 2021, the Stockholm China Center at the Institute for Security & Development Policy (ISDP) organized the seminar “Politics in East Asia Today.” Thirteen scholars from different […]
Merkel’s China Legacy
Abstract Angela Merkel’s time as the Chancellor of Germany is soon coming to an end. An unofficial mainstay of the European Union, she leaves office having helped put in place […]
The EU and PRC Exchange Sanctions
Abstract For the first time since the crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing in 1989, the European Union has decided to impose significant restrictive measures on Chinese officials. The Chinese […]
China and International Law: History, Theory, and Practice
Abstract The current contours of China’s economic growth and political influence have given rise to interests in and concerns about China’s global profile as well as its strategies of International […]
Beijing’s Foothold in Central America: El Salvador’s Diplomatic Realignment
Introduction The diplomatic struggle between China and Taiwan, officially the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the Republic of China (RoC) respectively, has intensified in recent years. Under the One […]
In the Wake of Covid-19: Troubled Waters Ahead for the European Union
Introduction The European response to the Covid-19 outbreak has been described as disjointed and insufficient. Blame has been placed upon the EU and its false portrayal of European solidarity in […]